ANCFlyer wrote:Jan 2010 . . .
Like I said in the other thread so related . . . I'd be concerned to hop onboard a 787 until the first dozen crash or so and they get the bugs worked out.
I'm not confident at all in that aircraft.
ANCFlyer wrote:Jan 2010 . . .
Like I said in the other thread so related . . . I'd be concerned to hop onboard a 787 until the first dozen crash or so and they get the bugs worked out.
I'm not confident at all in that aircraft.
Queso wrote:But I understand you're probably talking about the composite structure.
ANCFlyer wrote:Queso wrote:But I understand you're probably talking about the composite structure.
Generally, but considering the thing should have flown 2 years ago, and has been confronted with nothing but problems, problems, problems, It concerns me.
I didn't see that with all metal a/c . . . . they had their problems for sure, but at least Boeing met their deadlines. We're two years overdue, and that old saying "If it ain't Boeing, I ain't going" might need to be reconsidered.
JLAmber wrote:December the 20th 2012. The 787 will only see one day of active service![]()
kmh1956 wrote:JLAmber wrote:December the 20th 2012. The 787 will only see one day of active service![]()
But there's a party at SXM on the 22nd...maybe we'll go by 787....
JLAmber wrote:kmh1956 wrote:JLAmber wrote:December the 20th 2012. The 787 will only see one day of active service![]()
But there's a party at SXM on the 22nd...maybe we'll go by 787....
Then we'd have to call it the Apocalyse/Dreamliner When? meet
kmh1956 wrote:
I actually had suggested it ages ago on that other site...in celebration of the world NOT coming to an end, what better place for a bunch of aviation enthusiasts to party than SXM? Unfortuantely, I'm at work and a.net is blocked on the school's system so I can't access the thread....
At any rate...party on the beach at SXM on 12/22/2012...rain or shine.