You are at netAirspace : Forum : Spotting and Photography Forums : Aviation Photography

Photo Uploads - netAirspace vs. Facebook

Discuss with fellow aviation photographers, and share your latest shots here.
 

Zak (netAirspace FAA) 06 Aug 12, 11:53Post
I recently read a comment from a photographer, saying that Facebook rendered special interest websites redundant, and that he would upload his photos only to Facebook, instead of dedicated websites.

I don't quite agree with that, for several reasons:


Reach

On Facebook, your reach is limited to people who are following your posts.

That will not even be all of your Facebook friends. I have removed almost a third of my contacts from my wall, because they post too much stuff that doesn't interest me. I still have them on my friend list, but I don't see their posts anymore by default.

On netAirspace, you will reach like-minded people, no matter if you know them or not.


Sharing

Photos you post on Facebook cannot be shared anywhere else. You can't link them in forums or on other websites.

At netAirspace, we give you links to share your photos in our forum, in other forums, or on other websites - including Facebook.


Protection

Did you know that Facebook recently changed your primary e-mail address to <your name>@facebook.com? Check your account, you will be surprised.

Facebook's terms and policies are rather untransparent, and are changed frequently, without any information to the users.

At netAirspace, we are pretty clear about what we will do with your photos: we will only use them for our site, and only until you delete them (which you can do through a simple interface).

On Facebook, things are not so easy. By uploading photos, you give Facebook the right to transfer or sub-license the usage rights on your photos to third parties. And when you delete your photos, they can still use them if "your content has been shared with others, and they have not deleted it". Whatever that means.


Quality

On netAirspace, we want to present your photos in the best possible way, and we will keep improving the visual impression of our site.

Facebook does not have a specific approach to presenting photos. E.g. they just recently introduced force-squared thumbnails. For aircraft photos, that means that nose and tail will be cut off in the thumbnail view. Also, Facebook compresses photos you upload, resulting in a loss of quality.


Tl;dr
(That's: "Too long; didn't read" ;) )

Upload your photos to netAirspace, and share the photo link on Facebook.

You will then reach more people, and have more control over your photos.
Ideology: The mistaken belief that your beliefs are neither beliefs nor mistaken.
Click Click D'oh (Photo Quality Screener & Founding Member) 06 Aug 12, 12:29Post
There are still people out there putting up with Facebooks crap?
We sleep peacefully in our beds at night because rough men stand ready to do violence on our behalf
vikkyvik 06 Aug 12, 21:23Post
Zak wrote:That's: "Too long; didn't read"


Wow.....I can't believe I didn't know that. I learned something today (on NAS...whereas on Facebook, I would have gotten dumber instead of smarter).

Anyway, perhaps for some people, Facebook reaches everyone they need/want to reach with their photos.

But why, in Captain Scott's name, would you upload your photos to a site that automatically compresses and resizes them without uploader controls???????? Any editing done is pretty much negated.
vikkyvik 06 Aug 12, 21:52Post
OH, speaking of Facebook, those of us who upload to A.net will be interested in this thread:

http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forum ... in/375955/

I'm not liking that too much. Not because I'm worried, but more because they used to post about such things when they did them, but didn't about this one.
mhodgson (ATC & Photo Quality Screener & Founding Member) 06 Aug 12, 22:09Post
Interesting. Obviously when they upload images retain watermarks and copyright bars - however, I would assume that the Facebook TOS supercede this?
There's the right way, the wrong way and the railway.
vikkyvik 06 Aug 12, 22:41Post
mhodgson wrote:Interesting. Obviously when they upload images retain watermarks and copyright bars - however, I would assume that the Facebook TOS supercede this?


That's the exact question that Unattendedbag asked. Still waiting for a response from crew.

Cause yeah, that might not fly with a lot of people.
Zak (netAirspace FAA) 06 Aug 12, 22:47Post
Unless Facebook agreed on specific terms with a.net (which would surprise me), then indeed, the Facebook terms would apply for shots that a.net uploads directly to Facebook.

Furthermore, unless a.net would get specific approvals from photographers to upload their photos to Facebook, doing that would be a clear violation of a.net's own terms, namely ยง4B.

To post user photos on other websites, a.net would need a sub-licensable license from their users. Their terms don't include that.

I had recently set up a Tumblr account, as Tumblr seems to gain increasing importance in the blogosphere / social network scene, especially for creative content. But after finding out that the only way to share photos on Tumblr is by uploading them directly to the service, I discontinued that approach.

This may not be the right place to discuss a.net's policies. Still, I have to say, if they really upload user content directly to Facebook, then my understanding is that they are treading on thin ice.
Ideology: The mistaken belief that your beliefs are neither beliefs nor mistaken.
JLAmber (netAirspace ATC & Founding Member) 06 Aug 12, 22:55Post
Zak wrote:Unless Facebook agreed on specific terms with a.net (which would surprise me), then indeed, the Facebook terms would apply for shots that a.net uploads directly to Facebook.


Facebook does not individually negotiate terms with groups, groups must agree to Facebook's terms.

Zak wrote:To post user photos on other websites, a.net would need a sub-licensable license from their users. Their terms don't include that.


Uploading photos without such specific permission. Rule 5.1. states that:-
"You will not post content or take any action on Facebook that infringes or violates someone else's rights or otherwise violates the law."
Unless A-net have specifically stated in their t&c's that they are granted permission to post the images elsewhere (which I believe they do not specify) they are in breach of Facebook's t&c's.
A million great ideas...
mhodgson (ATC & Photo Quality Screener & Founding Member) 06 Aug 12, 22:58Post
So they're in breach of Facebook T&Cs as well as their own? {facepalm}
There's the right way, the wrong way and the railway.
ShyFlyer (Founding Member) 06 Aug 12, 23:03Post
Zak wrote:I recently read a comment from a photographer, saying that Facebook rendered special interest websites redundant

Hardly. I find them largely mutually exclusive.

Zak wrote:Photos you post on Facebook cannot be shared anywhere else. You can't link them in forums or on other websites.

Actually, they can. Not individual photos, but whole albums can be shared with people outside of Facebook.

Zak wrote:Facebook compresses photos you upload, resulting in a loss of quality.

That's the biggest problem.

mhodgson wrote:So they're in breach of Facebook T&Cs as well as their own? {facepalm}

Since when has A.Net followed their own rules?
Make Orwell fiction again.
JLAmber (netAirspace ATC & Founding Member) 06 Aug 12, 23:05Post
mhodgson wrote:So they're in breach of Facebook T&Cs as well as their own? {facepalm}


Unless anybody can find an item in A-net's t&c's that specifies that they have full permission to use uploaded images on Facebook (or a blanket condition permitting use on any site A-net choose) then, yes, they are.
A million great ideas...
vikkyvik 06 Aug 12, 23:09Post
Zak wrote:This may not be the right place to discuss a.net's policies.


I apologize for that. Read your post about Facebook, and had just read the A.net thread earlier today.
Zak (netAirspace FAA) 06 Aug 12, 23:17Post
vikkyvik wrote:
Zak wrote:This may not be the right place to discuss a.net's policies.


I apologize for that. Read your post about Facebook, and had just read the A.net thread earlier today.

No worries, after all, the topic is related. And as you can see, my above quoted sentence also continued with a "Still..." ;)
Ideology: The mistaken belief that your beliefs are neither beliefs nor mistaken.
vikkyvik 07 Aug 12, 22:21Post
Take a look at Paul's response to that thread. Am I really reading that correctly???
Zak (netAirspace FAA) 07 Aug 12, 22:36Post
vikkyvik wrote:Take a look at Paul's response to that thread. Am I really reading that correctly???

Oh boy... They are aware of it, and still do it?

Oh boy... {facepalm}
Ideology: The mistaken belief that your beliefs are neither beliefs nor mistaken.
ANCFlyer (netAirspace ATC & Founding Member) 08 Aug 12, 01:14Post
Someone for a screen capture please? Some of us don't have access there . . . perhaps just a link, I have other IPs from which I may browse. :)
LET'S GO BRANDON!!!!
paul mcallister 08 Aug 12, 19:47Post
Never felt the need to use Facebook or Twitter etc

If I want to keep in touch with friends I can email them,or phone them,or even go and visit them.

As far as I am concerned social media sites,are a little bit sad and a little bit creepy. ;)

I know many people use them and enjoy it,but I think it is very open to explotation by weirdos.
Nosedive 08 Aug 12, 19:59Post
paul mcallister wrote:
I know many people use them and enjoy it,but I think it is very open to explotation by weirdos.


It is, but you can mitigate much of the creep factor. Additionally, FB is how I stay in touch with many people. It's the 21st Century version of writing a letter to an out of state friend, for better or for worse.

For photos, I'll post some on there, but I post my av shots here.
 

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

LEFT

RIGHT
CONTENT