You are at netAirspace : Forum : Air and Space Forums : Military Aviation

Argie A-4 Sheds An External Tank

Your online Air Force Base.
 

miamiair (netAirspace FAA) 27 Jun 11, 17:57Post
click on the Linky.
And let's get one thing straight. There's a big difference between a pilot and an aviator. One is a technician; the other is an artist in love with flight. — E. B. Jeppesen
Queso (netAirspace ATC Tower Chief & Founding Member) 27 Jun 11, 18:06Post
Maybe it wasn't rated for M1.0. Looked pretty fast to me, if it was coming out of a dive it could have been close to Mach.
Slider... <sniff, sniff>... you stink.
miamiair (netAirspace FAA) 27 Jun 11, 18:24Post
Queso wrote:Maybe it wasn't rated for M1.0. Looked pretty fast to me, if it was coming out of a dive it could have been close to Mach.


Stop drinking that artificially flavored vodka.
And let's get one thing straight. There's a big difference between a pilot and an aviator. One is a technician; the other is an artist in love with flight. — E. B. Jeppesen
Click Click D'oh (Photo Quality Screener & Founding Member) 27 Jun 11, 18:39Post
Similar incident killed a Tomcat once. There's video of it out there somewhere.
We sleep peacefully in our beds at night because rough men stand ready to do violence on our behalf
captoveur 27 Jun 11, 21:10Post
Queso wrote:Maybe it wasn't rated for M1.0. Looked pretty fast to me, if it was coming out of a dive it could have been close to Mach.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think the A-4 is rated for M1.0

Looks like it might have been a G loading thing. He pulled up but the tank didn't come with him. It might scare all of us to think how old that airplane and tank are.
I like my coffee how I like my women: Black, bitter, and preferably fair trade.
tailhooker (Founding Member) 30 Jun 11, 11:55Post
Looking at the video, coming out of a dive or not in level flight the A-4 (especially double bubble) will not go supersonic or close to it. The tank probably failed for other reasons, sway bar fittings were old etc….who knows. Basically an A-4 (J-52-P8) will only go supersonic in a very steep dive, clean wing. At Lemoore they had a TA-4F with engine trimmed and they would get it supersonic once in a while.

Don’t remember any restrictions. I’ve had one up to .96 or so with centerline tanks. The problem is more of an airframe issue. Controls become heavy etc. It was not designed for supersonic flight, does not have a flying tail etc. Once you hang any gear, tanks, racks, ordnance the drag coefficient becomes a killer. Even in a dive at sea level, two tanks, probably 450 maybe 500 kts IAS would be the max on a pass like that.
BaylorAirBear (Founding Member) 30 Jun 11, 13:51Post
A dive a sea level sounds sounds most unadvisable.
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, you have boobs.
tailhooker (Founding Member) 30 Jun 11, 15:00Post
BaylorAirBear wrote:A dive a sea level sounds sounds most unadvisable.



The guys who I know did it at NLC ( Lemoore) started like at 37,000 pointed that sucker down and went for it. The bird was totally clean…no parent racks. I’m sure others have done it. The Top Gun A-4’s were clean and the Blues A-4’s with the 408’s were even more capable. Like most things, unless you’re somewhere out to sea or in an area cleared for it, it’s probably not worth the risks of a sonic boom. Very few guys (like the F-4’s) go SS, because at least in the navy we almost always had tanks. The F-8 drivers often did at sea as it was a pretty clean bird.
At low level without a “flying tail” pulling out would take a lot longer and take a lot more finesse
BaylorAirBear (Founding Member) 30 Jun 11, 19:58Post
Thanks, tail. I've never heard the term flying tail. Can you explain what that means?

BAB
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, you have boobs.
Click Click D'oh (Photo Quality Screener & Founding Member) 30 Jun 11, 20:22Post
BaylorAirBear wrote:Thanks, tail. I've never heard the term flying tail. Can you explain what that means?

BAB


A flying tail is where the entire horizontal stabilizer is actuated to act a a control surface. It's easiest to see in pictures of modern Navy cat shots.

Seen in action on this F-15:

Image
DSC07694 by Click Click D'oh, on Flickr

See how the whole horizontal stabilizer is deflected to act as the elevator? That's a flying tail

Compare to this A-4:

Image
DSC06111 by Click Click D'oh, on Flickr

Even though it's not deflected, you can clearly see the separation between the horizontal stabilizer and the elevator
We sleep peacefully in our beds at night because rough men stand ready to do violence on our behalf
miamiair (netAirspace FAA) 30 Jun 11, 20:23Post
BaylorAirBear wrote: Can you explain what that means?


A conventional tail, you have the horizontal stabilizer and the elevator is hinged at the aft end, like on of your ATRs. A flying tail has the entire stabilizer moving, not just providing pitch control but roll control as well, like in an F/A-18.

And let's get one thing straight. There's a big difference between a pilot and an aviator. One is a technician; the other is an artist in love with flight. — E. B. Jeppesen
tailhooker (Founding Member) 30 Jun 11, 20:31Post
BaylorAirBear wrote:Thanks, tail. I've never heard the term flying tail. Can you explain what that means?

BAB



The A-4 is like a 172. It has basic elevators…horizontal stab is fixed and elevator tabs move controlling pitch. I believe all the new AC the entire stabilizer moves giving the AC a lot more control and authority. Same with vertical stabs. In old AC they were fixed and the rudder tabs moved, you look at all the AC, like an F-18, the entire twin vertical stabilizers move even in opposite directions. Or something like that. Back to yard work. Miamiair can fill in the techno details and correct me. Over to you Lop’s
BaylorAirBear (Founding Member) 30 Jun 11, 23:20Post
Thanks for an explanation, dudes. Now I know exactly what a flying tail is.

BAB
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, you have boobs.
 

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

LEFT

RIGHT
CONTENT