You are at netAirspace : Forum : Air and Space Forums : Military Aviation

The Logic Behind Beijing’s Heavy-Handed Move

Your online Air Force Base.
 

miamiair (netAirspace FAA) 09 Dec 13, 12:07Post
China Uses ADIZ As Part Of Buffer-Building Strategy

East Asia and the U.S. had better get used to this sort of thing. China's heavy-handed declaration of an unusually demanding air defense identification zone (ADIZ) is only one in a series of moves in which the country will gradually try to exert control over its maritime approaches. Worryingly, it may also be an early example of China's Communist Party contriving to raise international tension as a means of rallying popular support at home.

Just about everything encourages China to be more assertive in neighboring waters, from its mistrustful, sometimes hostile view of the outside world to its domestic politics, rising strength and growing nationalism—and, not least, Japan's refusal to face up to its atrocious pre-1945 behavior.

Commercial air services are running normally through the ADIZ, which covers much of the East China Sea, including islands and a reef disputed by China, Japan and South Korea. There is no disruption even of flights by Japanese airlines, which are refusing to supply the Chinese authorities with the demanded flight plans for the zone, while other countries' commercial carriers cooperate. U.S., Japanese and South Korean military flights, however, have ignored Beijing's demands.

“From now it is a question of enforcement,” says Rory Medcalf, a specialist on Asian maritime security at the Lowy Institute, a think tank in Sydney. Having now asserted its rights, how—or will—China compel other countries to fully recognize them?

Airline compliance can be enforced administratively simply by withdrawing landing rights, although there is no sign of that happening. If Beijing were to not let Japanese airlines go to China, Tokyo would surely respond likewise. There then would be no direct air services between the world's second- and third-largest economies.

Attempts at enforcing the rules on military flights would surely be dangerous. Chinese vessels sometimes collide with U.S. naval ships in China's exclusive economic zone (EEZ), trying to enforce a claimed right to exclude foreign military activity. But threatening behavior in the air can have tragic results, as shown in 2001 when a Chinese fighter pilot died after apparently flying too close to, and colliding with, a U.S. Navy EP-3 Orion intelligence aircraft.

Link
And let's get one thing straight. There's a big difference between a pilot and an aviator. One is a technician; the other is an artist in love with flight. — E. B. Jeppesen
Fumanchewd 11 Dec 13, 02:50Post
SEA and Asian seas/ airspace in general will be the next large international crisis in my mind.

One only has to look at the history that China has had with its neighbors over the last several thousand years or so.

It has only been recently that they have allowed direct Taiwan to China flights.

I used to work for a management company that operated several private aircraft out of RCKH and RCTP for the Koo family. Despite the fact that they owned billions of dollars worth of banks and businesses in China we still had to have their 91 flights land in SK just to pick up a new clearance going to China. It was nothing but a petty political rule dictating thousands of aircraft every year.

We have seen these battles in the waters off of the Philippines, over islands with Japan, border disputes with Vietnam, and on and on and on.

China is pushing its newfound power exploring how far they can take their spheres of hegemony. From exploring and claiming rights in Antartica to developing Africa China will put their hands in everything regardless if it makes sense or not. Its only going to get worse.
"Give us a kiss, big tits."
 

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

LEFT

RIGHT
CONTENT