You are at netAirspace : Forum : The Combustion Chamber - Off-Topics : General Off-Topics

Despite not getting on with the guy (I've met him several times - last time was at a charity function in a restaurant where he greeted me with "F**k off, they don't serve steroids" ), I still believe he'd make a great Prime Minister. IMO, far more young people would vote if you got opinions like this in parliament:-

On Mandela’s claim that Cuba is a good advert for democracy: “Well Mr Mandela why don’t you go and ask one of the 12 year old Cuban prostitutes which way her parents voted?”

On the Lotus Elise: “This car is more fun than the entire French air force crashing into a firework factory.”

“I don’t often agree with the RSPCA as I believe it is an animal’s duty to be on my plate at supper time.”

“You cannot have this car with a diesel. Its like saying, I won’t go to Stringfellows tonight, I’ll get my mum to give me a lapdance, she’s a woman!”

On the Porsche Cayenne: “Honestly, I have seen more attractive gangrenous wounds than this. It has the sex appeal of a camel with gingivitis.”

http://www.inquisitr.com/2783/the-best- ... on-quotes/

Actually I think James May would be much better

cornish wrote:Actually I think James May would be much better

Well, he could wear the Queen's old dresses for his political appearances .

Besides, he is too politically correct compared to Clarkson, and I personally always root for the guy that is the least politically correct, so naturally Jeremy would have my vote :D .

DAL764 wrote:

cornish wrote:Actually I think James May would be much better

Well, he could wear the Queen's old dresses for his political appearances .

Besides, he is too politically correct compared to Clarkson, and I personally always root for the guy that is the least politically correct, so naturally Jeremy would have my vote :D .

Yes but James is much funnier - and any PM of the UK has to be someone we can all have a good laugh at

I think it should be Richard Hammond - he knows how to recover from a spectacular crash...

ShanwickOceanic wrote:I think it should be Richard Hammond - he knows how to recover from a spectacular crash...

Perhaps, but a Prime Minister should be someone who can look above the speaking podium without standing on 2 boxes .

DAL764 wrote:

ShanwickOceanic wrote:I think it should be Richard Hammond - he knows how to recover from a spectacular crash...

Perhaps, but a Prime Minister should be someone who can look above the speaking podium without standing on 2 boxes .

Mocking the vertically challenged, are we?

DAL764 wrote:Perhaps, but a Prime Minister should be someone who can look above the speaking podium without standing on 2 boxes

Is this about Sarkozy?

Do you all mean that soon Brown will go into the dustbin of history?

AndesSMF wrote:Do you all mean that soon Brown will go into the dustbin of history?

Compared to Brown and the Labour Party, Bush and the GOP are paragons of political perspicacity and financial probity. And just look at how the Republicans fared last year. Labour is on course for an electoral battering, and Brown will go down firstly as the worst Chancellor and secondly the worst Prime Minister in living memory.

Is Brown already packing his bags? Is defeat pretty certain?

44Magnum wrote:Compared to Brown and the Labour Party, Bush and the GOP are paragons of political perspicacity and financial probity. And just look at how the Republicans fared last year. Labour is on course for an electoral battering, and Brown will go down firstly as the worst Chancellor and secondly the worst Prime Minister in living memory.

Unfortunately, the Tories scare me even more than another four years of Labour. And unless the public decide to vote "none of the above", the Lib Dems haven't got a chance.

AndesSMF wrote:Is Brown already packing his bags? Is defeat pretty certain?

Gordoom thinks he's the saviour of the world; it's going to take a crowbar to pry him out of Downing Street.

I think the best outcome Labour could hope for is something called a hung parliament, where no party has an overall majority in the House of Commons and Brown would have to negotiate a coalition with a smaller party so as to cling onto power.

ShanwickOceanic wrote:Unfortunately, the Tories scare me even more than another four years of Labour. And unless the public decide to vote "none of the above", the Lib Dems haven't got a chance.

I'm none too enthusiastic about Cameron either, but I gather for different reasons to you. The real danger is the public buying Labour lies about "Labour investment versus Tory cuts," despite any competent economist knowing that to be a mendacious claim. In the meanwhile, Labour continues to denude Great Britain by turning us into a bankrupt, impotent, politically correct and antidemocratic police state, but the public seem unconcerned as long as they can continue boozing and voting people out on Big Brother. What a difference 12 years makes.