ShyFlyer wrote:
At Laughlin AFB it was legal at 18. Base Commander made that call since he thought it was better to have them drink on base rather than go get drunk in Mexico. It changed back to 21 recently, but I don't know why.
Change in command.. Pressure from his bosses.. Or some clown at MADD found out about it.
I have serious issues with MADD and the 21 drinking age.
The drinking age needs to be 18.. Same with the driving age. Making it 21 just encourages binge drinking, drunk driving, and otherwise stupid behavior. It is a fact of life that high school and college aged kids are going to rebel, and the easiest (and dumbest) law to break is the drinking age.
I have a long rant I wrote about that but I will spare you all- because the thread is about smoking.
Anyway. MADD needs to take a step back and think if it is really worth ruining someones life over driving right at the limit. Is it dangerous? Yep. Can people die? Yep. Is it preventable? Yes. I am all for throwing someone in jail for a long damn time and making sure its years before they have a valid DL for the second one. However, I am not for ruining someones life on the first mistake if they are under .10, and weren't in an accident. Taking their DL for 6 months, towing their car, and letting them sit in jail overnight is no small matter for the average first time DWI offender. Many of the DWI offenders we bag have ZERO criminal history.. and usually the night in the real jail next to bubba is a big eye opener.
The punishment needs to take into account how high someones BAL is.. I had a few other ideas but I am finally starting to get tired.
Anyway, the drinking age is never going down and the driving age is never going up.. But we would all be safer if both did.
I like my coffee how I like my women: Black, bitter, and preferably fair trade.